Sunday 3 July 2016

'Legend of Tarzan' Makes A Mockery of Black Characters in Incredibly Racist Movie

(From r.) Alexander Skarsgard, Margot Robbie and Samuel L. Jackson in "The Legend of Tarzan."

What year is this again? The new “Legend of Tarzan” is such a crazy racist movie that it makes 1915’s “Birth of a Nation” look like a civil rights epic.
Forget diversity at the Academy Awards, ”The Legend of Tarzan” treats black actors as though they just exist for black background noise.
No, it doesn’t matter that Samuel L. Jackson plays George Washington Williams, a real-life African-American lawyer and politician. Here Williams, speaking like a wiseass hipster circa 2016, has gone to England to persuade whitey white Tarzan (Alexander Skarsgard), to travel with him to the Congo to investigate the enslavement of natives by King Leopold of Belgium.
No, a black man can’t do it alone. He needs a bizarrely educated, perfectly mannered white ape boy, raised by gorillas, to do it.
Jackson’s character, unfortunately, soon becomes the black foil to Tarzan the Great White Hope. Williams is, as they used to say before we were supposedly enlightened, the token negro. He’s even wearing a garish purple outfit and spewing outrageous dialogue when we meet him at a stuffy, white diplomatic conference in England.
It’s the first indication that you’ve entered a movie time machine. Luckily, Jackson is such a good actor he can make you forget — well, for minutes at a time anyway — why he’s there, which seems to be only to assuage white movie-goer guilt.
And by the way? It doesn’t work. After seeing this thing, I felt as guilty as a slaver myself.
Alexander Skarsgard's Tarzan gets to be the white savior while black characters are pushed aside.
In this laugh-til-you-cringe action movie, Tarzan, blond locks flowing, pecs a’flying, not only has to save his wife, Jane (Margot Robbie), from the evil white slaver, but has to almost single-handedly defeat an entire army, as well as a phalanx of evil black tribal guys in white face. Why? To again almost-single handedly free all the black slaves in the Congo. Tarzan slaver slayer!
No, you won’t see any “Roots”-type brutal reality here. Instead the slaves get captured, but easily escape with the help of Tarzan and Jane’s resourcefulness and some help from Williams who can fire a canon like nobody.
Even the great actor Djimon Hounsou, who plays a tribal leader out to kill Tarzan, is totally wasted despite his nifty leopard getup.
But the worst of it doesn’t come until the end when all the freed slaves and tribesmen, in loin cloths, line up to cheer Tarzan for saving them.
The director, David Yates, actually told The Los Angeles Times that, “All that racist baggage that belonged to the earlier books or earlier B-movies, there’s no place for that. This is a modern film with modern sensibilities.” God help us if he’s right.
Reality check: Over 10 million Congolese slaves died horrible deaths and Yates thinks his “Tarzan” scenario in which the black slaves were really saved by a white ape man is not racist? Is Yates ape-s--t?
If you didn’t know better, you’d think the latest “Tarzan” was a Mel Brooks production. All that’s missing are dancing slaves in chains.
Springtime for Leopold in Africa!

Source: Nydaily

No comments:

Post a Comment